A rational number has a terminating decimal expansion whose last non-zero digit occurs in the 4th decimal place. Show that such a number can be written in the form , where is an integer not divisible by 10. Is it necessary that the denominator of this rational number, when written in the lowest form, is divisible by or ? Give reasons.
A rational number with a terminating decimal expansion whose last non-zero digit is in the 4th decimal place can be expressed with a denominator that is a power of 10. Since the last non-zero digit occurs in the 4th decimal place, any digits after this must be zero. Therefore, the number can be written as an integer divided by . Let this integer be . Thus, the number is of the form:
Furthermore, if were divisible by 10, the last digit of would be 0. This would mean that the last non-zero digit of the decimal expansion actually occurs in the 3rd decimal place or earlier, which contradicts the given condition. Hence, must be an integer that is not divisible by 10.
Regarding the second part, it is necessary that the denominator of this rational number, when written in its lowest form, is divisible by or . The denominator in its lowest form is obtained by cancelling the common factors of and (which is ). Since is not divisible by 10, it cannot be divisible by both 2 and 5, but it may be divisible by one of them.
For example, consider the rational number:
The last non-zero digit is in the 4th decimal place. Its denominator in lowest form is , which is divisible by but not . Similarly,
has a lowest form denominator of , which is divisible by but not . Thus, the lowest form denominator must be divisible by either or (or both), but it is not necessary for it to be divisible by any specific one of them.
Explanation
The question tests the understanding of terminating decimal expansions and their relationship with the prime factorization of the denominator. A terminating decimal can always be written as an integer divided by a power of 10. If the last non-zero digit is in the 4th decimal place, the denominator is , and the numerator cannot be a multiple of 10 (otherwise, the decimal would terminate earlier).
For the second part, the lowest form denominator is obtained by removing common factors from . Since the numerator is not a multiple of 10, it doesn't contain both 2 and 5 as factors, but it might contain one of them. Therefore, the lowest form denominator could be (if 5 is cancelled), (if 2 is cancelled), or (if neither is cancelled).
It is necessary that the denominator is divisible by or to ensure the decimal terminates at the 4th place, but it is not necessary for it to be divisible by both or any specific one.
Solution Steps
Step 1: A terminating decimal with the last non-zero digit in the 4th decimal place can be written as an integer divided by , i.e.,
Step 2: If were divisible by 10, the last digit of would be 0, meaning the decimal would terminate at the 3rd place or earlier. Hence, is not divisible by 10.
Step 3: The denominator in lowest form is found by cancelling common factors of and .
Step 4: Since is not divisible by 10, it cannot contain both 2 and 5 as factors. Therefore, when cancelling common factors from , the lowest form denominator must retain at least or (or both). For instance,
has a lowest form denominator of (divisible by but not ), and
has a lowest form denominator of (divisible by but not ). Thus, it IS necessary for the denominator to be divisible by or , though not necessarily by any specific one of them.