| Rank | City | Population (2011) | Population (2001) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mumbai | 1,24,42,373 | 1,19,78,450 |
| 2 | New Delhi | 1,10,07,835 | 98,79,172 |
| 3 | Bengaluru | 84,25,970 | 43,01,326 |
| 4 | Hyderabad | 68,09,970 | 36,37,483 |
| 5 | Ahmedabad | 55,70,585 | 35,20,085 |
| 6 | Chennai | 46,81,087 | 43,43,645 |
| 7 | Kolkata | 44,86,679 | 45,72,876 |
| 8 | Surat | 44,67,797 | 24,33,835 |
| 9 | Vadodara | 35,52,371 | 16,90,000 |
| 10 | Pune | 31,15,431 | 25,38,473 |
| 11 | Jaipur | 30,46,163 | 23,22,575 |
| 12 | Lucknow | 28,15,601 | 21,85,927 |
| 13 | Kanpur | 27,67,031 | 25,51,337 |
| 14 | Nagpur | 24,05,665 | 20,52,066 |
What is your general observation about this data? Share it with the class.
General observations about the population data:
(1) Mumbai has the highest population among the listed cities in both 2001 and 2011.
(2) Most cities show population growth between 2001 and 2011.
(3) Bengaluru and Surat show very significant population growth, almost doubling.
(4) Chennai and Kolkata show relatively smaller population changes.
(5) The cities are ranked by 2011 population in descending order.
Explanation
The chapter presents a table of population data for Indian cities from 2001 and 2011 censuses. Students are encouraged to observe patterns and trends in the data.
Solution Steps
Mumbai has the highest population among the listed cities in both 2001 and 2011.
Most cities show population growth between 2001 and 2011.
Bengaluru and Surat show very significant population growth, almost doubling.
Chennai and Kolkata show relatively smaller population changes.
The cities are ranked by 2011 population in descending order.