Question 24 of 43beginner💡 UnderstandVery Short1 mark
| Rank | City | Population (2011) | Population (2001) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mumbai | 1,24,42,373 | 1,19,78,450 |
| 2 | New Delhi | 1,10,07,835 | 98,79,172 |
| 3 | Bengaluru | 84,25,970 | 43,01,326 |
| 4 | Hyderabad | 68,09,970 | 36,37,483 |
| 5 | Ahmedabad | 55,70,585 | 35,20,085 |
| 6 | Chennai | 46,81,087 | 43,43,645 |
| 7 | Kolkata | 44,86,679 | 45,72,876 |
| 8 | Surat | 44,67,797 | 24,33,835 |
| 9 | Vadodara | 35,52,371 | 16,90,000 |
| 10 | Pune | 31,15,431 | 25,38,473 |
| 11 | Jaipur | 30,46,163 | 23,22,575 |
| 12 | Lucknow | 28,15,601 | 21,85,927 |
| 13 | Kanpur | 27,67,031 | 25,51,337 |
| 14 | Nagpur | 24,05,665 | 20,52,066 |
What is an appropriate title for the above table?
Correct Answer
An appropriate title would be: "Population of Major Indian Cities (2001 and 2011 Census Data)" or "Population Growth in Major Indian Cities (2001-2011)"
Exercise: Populations of Cities | Q: 2 | (Page Page 12-13)
For More Understanding
Explanation
The table shows population data for Indian cities from two census years, so the title should reflect this content.