Question 24 of 43beginner💡 UnderstandVery Short1 mark
RankCityPopulation (2011)Population (2001)
1Mumbai1,24,42,3731,19,78,450
2New Delhi1,10,07,83598,79,172
3Bengaluru84,25,97043,01,326
4Hyderabad68,09,97036,37,483
5Ahmedabad55,70,58535,20,085
6Chennai46,81,08743,43,645
7Kolkata44,86,67945,72,876
8Surat44,67,79724,33,835
9Vadodara35,52,37116,90,000
10Pune31,15,43125,38,473
11Jaipur30,46,16323,22,575
12Lucknow28,15,60121,85,927
13Kanpur27,67,03125,51,337
14Nagpur24,05,66520,52,066

What is an appropriate title for the above table?

Correct Answer

An appropriate title would be: "Population of Major Indian Cities (2001 and 2011 Census Data)" or "Population Growth in Major Indian Cities (2001-2011)"

Exercise: Populations of Cities | Q: 2 | (Page Page 12-13)
For More Understanding

Explanation

The table shows population data for Indian cities from two census years, so the title should reflect this content.