There is a view that absolute economic equality is neither possible nor desirable. It is argued that the most a society can do is to try and reduce the gaps between the richest and poorest members of society. Do you agree?
Yes, I agree with the view that absolute economic equality is neither possible nor desirable. Absolute equality of wealth or income has probably never existed in a society. This suggests that complete economic equality is practically impossible to achieve.
It can be argued that some inequalities reflect the differences of talent and ability of human beings as well as their different contributions towards social progress and prosperity. If everyone received equal rewards regardless of effort or skill, it would discourage people from working hard or developing their abilities.
However, this does not mean that society should accept all inequalities. Social and economic inequalities hinder the pursuit of equal opportunities. When there are significant differences in wealth, property, or income between individuals or classes, it prevents people from accessing the same opportunities.
Most democracies today try to make equal opportunities available to people in the belief that this would at least give those who have talent and determination the chance to improve their condition. The state has a significant role in making policies to prevent discrimination and providing incentives for education and employment.
Therefore, while absolute equality may not be achievable, society must work towards reducing the gaps between the richest and poorest members and ensuring that equal opportunities are available to all citizens.
Explanation
The answer draws directly from the textbook context which states that absolute equality has probably never existed. It incorporates the key argument that inequalities may reflect differences in talent and contributions, while also emphasizing that democracies focus on providing equal opportunities. The state's role in reducing inequalities through policies is mentioned as per the context. The answer maintains balance by agreeing with the view while explaining both why absolute equality is not possible and what alternatives exist.