'Ravi is a good detective'. Give one argument in favour of and against the given statement.
Ravi's skills as a detective can be evaluated from two different perspectives based on the events of the story.
In favour of the statement, Ravi displays good observational skills and quick decision-making. When Grandpa leaves suddenly, Ravi runs out just in time to see his bright-yellow cap disappearing round the corner. He decides to follow Grandpa secretly at a safe distance, successfully tracking his movements to the children's park and the tea stall without losing sight of him initially.
Against the statement, Ravi fails at the primary rule of detective work: remaining undetected. Grandpa is completely aware of Ravi's actions earlier in the day. This is evident when Grandpa gifts Ravi a book titled The Best Detective Stories, suggesting he knew Ravi was trailing him. Grandpa even playfully advises Ravi to pick up some "good tips on how to be a detective", clearly indicating that Ravi's stealth was unsuccessful.
Therefore, while Ravi shows enthusiasm and basic trailing ability, his failure to go unnoticed proves he still has much to learn about being a good detective.
Explanation
The question requires one argument for and one against Ravi being a good detective. The argument in favour focuses on Ravi's quick reflexes and successful trailing (spotting the yellow cap, following at a safe distance). The argument against focuses on his lack of stealth, as proven by Grandpa's awareness of being followed, which Grandpa reveals through the thoughtful gift of a detective book and his teasing remark about picking up tips.
Solution Steps
Step 1: Identify an action showing Ravi's good detective skills (e.g., quickly spotting Grandpa's yellow cap, following at a safe distance).
Step 2: Identify an action showing Ravi's poor detective skills (e.g., failing to remain undetected, as revealed by Grandpa's gift and comments).
Step 3: Structure the answer presenting both arguments clearly with evidence from the text.