Question 9 of 13intermediate🔍 AnalyzeEssay3 marks

What, according to you, could the tradition of using the mother's name at the beginning of a king's name signify?

Correct Answer

The tradition of using the mother's name at the beginning of a king's name, as practised by the Sātavāhanas (like Gautamīputra Sātakarṇi named after his mother Gautamī Balaśhrī), signifies the high status and importance of royal women in Sātavāhana society.

This practice indicates that queens and royal mothers held significant influence in the kingdom, as evidenced by Gautamī Balaśhrī's donations of land to Buddhist monks and her important inscription at Nāshik.

The tradition may also reflect matrilineal elements in the society, where lineage through the mother was considered important for establishing legitimacy and identity.

It demonstrates that women were not merely passive figures but active participants in governance and public life, with their names carrying enough prestige to enhance the status of their sons.

Exercise: THINK ABOUT IT | Q: 1 | (Page Page 10)
For More Understanding

Explanation

The chapter on page 10 discusses the Sātavāhana tradition where princes were often named after their mothers. The example given is Gautamīputra Sātakarṇi, named after his mother Gautamī Balaśhrī. The text mentions she was a powerful queen who donated land to Buddhist monks and had an important inscription carved in Nāshik, showing her influence. This 'Think About It' question encourages students to consider what this practice reveals about the status of women in ancient Indian society.

Solution Steps

  1. The tradition of using the mother's name signifies the high status and importance of royal women in Sātavāhana society

  2. Queens and royal mothers held significant influence in the kingdom, as evidenced by Gautamī Balaśhrī's land donations and inscription at Nāshik

  3. The tradition may reflect matrilineal elements where lineage through the mother was important for establishing legitimacy and identity

  4. Women were active participants in governance and public life, not merely passive figures