Regional movements need not lead to separatist demands, as demonstrated by several examples from the chapter.

First, regional aspirations are a normal part of democratic politics, not an aberration. Even smaller countries like the United Kingdom face regional aspirations in Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland. In India, a large and diverse democracy, regional aspirations must be dealt with on a regular basis as nation-building is an ongoing process.

Second, the best way to respond to regional aspirations is through democratic negotiations rather than suppression. During the 1980s, when militancy erupted in Punjab, problems persisted in the North-East, students agitated in Assam, and Kashmir was on the boil, the Government of India reached negotiated settlements with regional movements. This produced reconciliation and reduced tensions in many regions.

Third, the example of Mizoram clearly shows how political settlement can resolve the problem of separatism effectively. Most struggles during this period concluded in negotiated settlements or accords between the central government and groups leading movements for autonomy. These accords were reached through dialogue aimed at settling contentious issues within the constitutional framework.

Fourth, regional aspirations in the North-East are expressed in different ways: movements against outsiders, movements for greater autonomy, and movements for separate national existence. This variety shows that regional movements can have diverse demands beyond separatism.

Thus, regional movements can be accommodated through democratic negotiations and accords without leading to separatist outcomes.