Read the section once more and explain the similarities and differences you notice in the ways in which leaders emerged during the revolt. For any two leaders, discuss why ordinary people were drawn to them.
Leaders emerged during the revolt in both similar and different ways. A key similarity was that leaders emerged across regions to provide leadership and organization needed to fight the British. All became focal points for rebellion against firangi raj.
However, there were significant differences. Some were traditional elites like ranis, rajas, nawabs and taluqdars. The sepoys from Meerut rushed to Delhi and appealed to the Mughal emperor Bahadur Shah to accept leadership. Though initially horrified, he eventually agreed to become the nominal leader.
Others emerged from religious backgrounds. In Meerut, a fakir appeared riding an elephant, and sepoys visited him frequently. In Lucknow, religious leaders and self-styled prophets preached the destruction of British rule.
Additionally, local leaders emerged from ordinary backgrounds. Shah Mal mobilized villagers of pargana Barout, while Gonoo, a tribal cultivator, became a rebel leader of the Kol tribals.
Ordinary people were drawn to Bahadur Shah because they sought those who had been leaders before British conquest. They were drawn to local leaders like Shah Mal because these leaders urged peasants, zamindars and tribals to revolt against both British and local oppressors, reflecting an attempt to overturn traditional hierarchies and create a more egalitarian society.
Explanation
The textbook clearly distinguishes between three types of leaders: traditional elites (like Bahadur Shah), religious leaders (fakirs and self-styled prophets), and local leaders from ordinary backgrounds (Shah Mal, Gonoo). The similarity lies in all providing leadership against British rule. For why people were drawn to them: Bahadur Shah represented pre-British authority and legitimacy, while local leaders like Shah Mal appealed to ordinary people by attacking both British rule and local oppressors, offering a vision of egalitarianism.