Archaeologists use present-day analogies to try and understand what ancient artefacts were used for. Mackay was comparing present-day querns with what he found. Is this a useful strategy?
Yes, Mackay's strategy of comparing present-day querns with ancient ones is a useful strategy. Archaeologists often shape their understanding of an artefact's function by its resemblance to present-day things, with querns being an obvious example. This method helps them classify finds and determine whether objects were tools, ornaments, or ritual items.
In Mackay's case, the analogy proved valuable. He identified two types of saddle querns: one used with a smaller stone pushed to and fro for grinding grain, and another used with a pounder for herbs and spices. His workmen even dubbed the latter "curry stones," and his cook requested one for kitchen use, showing how present-day practices can illuminate ancient functions.
Explanation
The textbook explicitly states that understanding artefact function is 'often shaped by its resemblance with present-day things.' Mackay's comparison allowed him to distinguish between querns for grain and those for pounding herbs/spices. The anecdote about his cook borrowing a 'curry stone' demonstrates the practical validity of this analogy. This strategy is part of archaeologists' broader effort to classify finds by function and develop frames of reference for interpreting discoveries.