Discuss the ways in which the Alvars, Nayanars and Virashaivas expressed critiques of the caste system.
The Alvars and Nayanars initiated a movement of protest against the caste system and the dominance of Brahmanas. This is evidenced by the fact that bhaktas hailed from diverse social backgrounds, ranging from Brahmanas to artisans, cultivators, and even castes considered "untouchable".
They challenged the Brahmanical monopoly over sacred knowledge. The Nalayira Divyaprabandham, a major anthology of Alvar compositions, was described as the Tamil Veda, claiming equal significance to the four Vedas in Sanskrit cherished by Brahmanas.
The Alvar saint Tondaradippodi, a Brahmana himself, expressed a sharp critique by stating that Vishnu prefers "servants" who express love for his feet, even if born as outcastes, over Chaturvedins (Brahmanas versed in the four Vedas) who lack devotion. This directly questioned caste-based privileges.
The Virashaivas or Lingayats offered a more radical critique by challenging the very idea of caste and the "pollution" attributed to certain groups by Brahmanas. They also questioned the theory of rebirth.
Additionally, the Lingayats encouraged practices disapproved in the Dharmashastras, such as post-puberty marriage and the remarriage of widows. These critiques, expressed through their vachanas in Kannada, won them followers among those marginalised within the Brahmanical social order.
Explanation
The answer draws directly from Section 2.2 'Attitudes towards caste' which discusses the protest movement of Alvars and Nayanars against caste system and Brahmanical dominance. Key evidence includes: (1) diverse social backgrounds of bhaktas, (2) the Tamil Veda claim challenging Brahmanical monopoly, (3) Tondaradippodi's composition privileging outcaste devotees over Chaturvedins, and (4) Lingayats' radical rejection of caste, pollution, rebirth theory, and Dharmashastra prescriptions. The answer follows the textbook structure while maintaining exam-appropriate length.