Compare the chemistry of actinoids with that of the lanthanoids with special reference to:
electronic configuration
In lanthanoids, the 4f orbitals are being filled, while in actinoids, the 5f orbitals are occupied. The 5f electrons penetrate less into the inner core and are more effectively shielded from the nuclear charge than the 4f electrons of corresponding lanthanoids.
atomic and ionic sizes and
Both series exhibit contraction effects. The actinoid contraction is greater from element to element than the lanthanoid contraction. Actinoids show greater structural variability due to irregularities in metallic radii which are far greater than in lanthanoids. These contractions have extended effects on sizes and properties of elements succeeding them.
oxidation state
Actinoids display a wide range of oxidation states from +3 to +7, making their chemistry more complicated. Lanthanoids predominantly show +3 oxidation state, though some like Cerium exhibit +4 state. Early actinoids resemble lanthanoids in showing gradual variation in properties without change in oxidation state.
chemical reactivity.
The ionisation enthalpies of early actinoids are lower than for early lanthanoids. Since outer electrons in actinoids are less firmly held, they are more available for bonding. Actinoid chemistry is more complicated due to wide range of oxidation states and radioactivity. Behaviour similar to lanthanoids is not evident until the second half of the actinoid series.
Explanation
This question requires comparing f-block elements across four parameters. The key differences stem from the nature of 5f vs 4f orbitals - 5f electrons are less penetrating and more shielded, leading to lower ionisation enthalpies and greater availability for bonding in actinoids. The greater actinoid contraction and wider range of oxidation states (+3 to +7) make actinoid chemistry more complex than lanthanoid chemistry.