Principled distance is a concept followed by Indian secularism that distinguishes it from the western model of secularism. Unlike the idea of separation as mutual exclusion, principled distance allows for a more flexible relationship between the state and religion.

Indian secularism rejects the idea that separation must mean non-interference in all religious matters. Principled distance allows for both interference and non-interference depending upon the specific values the state aims to promote. This means the state can engage with religious matters when necessary to uphold constitutional values.

Importantly, interference under principled distance does not automatically mean coercive intervention. The state can act as a facilitator by supporting liberal and democratic voices within every religion rather than imposing reforms through coercion. This approach respects religious freedom while addressing issues of inequality.

The nature and extent of separation under principled distance takes different forms depending upon the specific values it is meant to promote. The state is separated from organised religion and its institutions for the sake of values like equality and freedom, but this separation is flexible rather than rigid.

Principled distance thus represents a balanced approach where the state neither completely withdraws from religious matters nor excessively interferes with religious freedom of communities.