What is the difference between judicial review and writ?
Judicial review refers to the power of the judiciary to interpret the Constitution and the laws passed by the legislature. This enables the judiciary to protect the Constitution effectively and safeguard the rights of citizens. The scope of judicial review has expanded to include areas like powers of the President and Governor.
Writ jurisdiction allows individuals whose fundamental rights have been violated to directly approach the Supreme Court or High Courts for remedy. Through writs, the Court can issue special orders directing the executive to act or not act in a particular way.
Together, both writ powers and review powers make the judiciary very powerful in protecting citizens' rights and upholding the Constitution.
Explanation
The textbook clearly distinguishes between the two concepts. Judicial review is about the court's power to interpret the Constitution and laws, while writ jurisdiction is about the court's power to issue special orders when fundamental rights are violated. The context explicitly states that 'Together, the writ powers and the review power of the Court make judiciary very powerful.'