If you were asked to make suggestions for changing the procedure of appointing judges, what changes would you suggest?
To improve the procedure of appointing judges, I would suggest establishing a balanced system where both the judiciary and the executive have a meaningful role. The current system gives greater weight to the decision of the group of senior judges of the Supreme Court through the principle of collegiality.
However, since the appointment of judges has never been free from political controversy and multiple actors like the Council of Ministers, Governors, and Chief Ministers influence the process, a more transparent mechanism could be introduced. The criteria for appointments should strictly be based on experience as a lawyer and being well versed in law.
Political opinions or political loyalty of a person should not be the criteria for appointments. This would ensure that party politics does not play a role in the process and the independence of the judiciary is maintained.
Explanation
The textbook context discusses the evolution of judicial appointments in India, highlighting how the Supreme Court established the collegium system where the Chief Justice recommends names in consultation with four senior-most judges. The context emphasizes that appointments should be based on legal expertise rather than political considerations, and notes that the legislature is not involved in appointments to prevent party politics from influencing the process. A student's answer should reflect these principles while suggesting improvements.