A former Chief Election Commissioner joined a political party and contested elections. There are various views on this issue. One view is that a former Election Commissioner is an independent citizen and has a right to join any political party and to contest election. According to the other view, leaving this possibility open can affect the impartiality of the Election Commission. So, former Election Commissioners must not be allowed to contest any elections. Which position do you agree with and why?
I agree with the view that former Election Commissioners must not be allowed to contest elections immediately after leaving office. This position is justified on grounds of maintaining the impartiality of the Election Commission.
The Election Commission is a constitutional body responsible for conducting free and fair elections. If Election Commissioners are allowed to join political parties and contest elections after retirement, it raises serious concerns about their neutrality while in office. They might favour certain political parties with the expectation of future political benefits.
The context highlights that there is already a fear that the ruling party can appoint a partisan person to the Commission who might favour them in elections. This apprehension exists even without the possibility of Commissioners joining politics later. Allowing such a possibility would further damage public trust in the institution.
Many experts have suggested that the appointment procedure should be changed to include consultation with the Leader of Opposition and the Chief Justice of India. This shows the need for strengthening the independence and credibility of the Commission. Barring former Commissioners from contesting elections would be another step in this direction.
While every citizen has the right to contest elections, the position of Election Commissioner carries special responsibilities. A cooling-off period before contesting elections would balance both individual rights and institutional integrity. This would ensure that the Commission remains truly independent and elections stay free and fair.
Explanation
This question requires students to take a position and justify it. The context mentions the fear of partisan appointments and suggestions for reform, which support the argument for maintaining impartiality. A good answer acknowledges both views but takes a clear stand with reasoning.