Option (d) is not a reasonable explanation. The provided text states that the Parliament believed it had the 'power and responsibility to make laws (and amendments) for furthering the interests of the poor, backward and the needy.' This directly contradicts the claim that the Legislature cannot be entrusted to protect the rights of the citizens. The conflict arose because the Judiciary insisted that these measures must follow the framework of the Constitution and legal procedures, not because the Legislature was untrustworthy. The other options are reasonable: differing interpretations (a) are natural in a democracy (b), the Constitution allows amendments by special majority while prioritizing certain principles (c), and the Judiciary's role is limited to deciding constitutionality rather than resolving political debates (e).